The Essentials of the
Catholic Faith
|
|
The Eucarist |
| |
|
The Holy
Eucharist is unique among
the sacraments. Even the
variety of names by which it
is called emphasizes the
central position which it
occupies in Catholic
Christianity. It is the
Blessed Sacrament, the
Lord’s Supper, the Holy of
Holies, the Table of the
Lord, the Body and Blood of
Christ, the Sacrifice of the
Mass, Holy Communion, the
Sacrament of the Altar,
Viaticum, and the Real
Presence – to mention only a
few of the titles by which
the Church has identified
this central Mystery of
Faith.
Yet among the
names that have come down to
us, the most favored is the
“Eucharist,” from the Greek
word Eucharistia,
which means “Thanksgiving.”
It appears already in the
writings of St. Ignatius of
Antioch (died 107 A.D.) and
St. Justin, Martyr (died 165
A.D.).
We may say
there are three cardinal
mysteries of the Christian
religion, namely, the
Trinity, the Incarnation,
and the Eucharist. Among
these the Eucharist implies
the other two, since without
the Trinity there would have
been no Incarnation, and
without the Incarnation
there would have been no
Eucharist.
Our purpose
here is mainly to consider
the Eucharist as a sacrament
that is a visible sign
instituted by Christ, which
effectively produces the
grace it signifies. Yet in
reflecting on the Eucharist
as a sacrament, we must keep
in mind what Pope John Paul
II said in the first
encyclical he wrote as
Bishop of Rome.
The
Church lives by the
Eucharist, by the
fullness of this
sacrament, the
stupendous content and
meaning of which have
often been expressed in
the Church’s magisterium
from the most distant
times down to our own
days….
Indeed,
the Eucharist is the
ineffable sacrament! The
essential commitment
and, above all, the
visible grace and source
of supernatural strength
for the Church as the
People of God is to
persevere and advance
constantly in
Eucharistic life and
Eucharistic piety, and
to develop spiritually
in the climate of the
Eucharist….
With all
the greater reason,
then, it is not
permissible for us, in
thought, life, or action
to take away from this
truly most Holy
Sacrament its full
magnitude and its
essential meaning….
It is at
one and the same time a
sacrifice-sacrament, a
communion-sacrament, and
a Presence-sacrament (The
Redeemer of Man, IV,
20).
Consequently,
although the Eucharist is
one sacrament, it is a
sacrament in three
distinctive ways as
sacrifice, communion, and
Presence. We shall examine
each of these in sequence,
while seeing how each one
relates to the other two.
Eucharist as
Sacrifice – Sacrament
The most
serious challenge to the
Catholic faith in the
Eucharist was the claim that
the Mass is not a real but
merely a symbolic sacrifice.
To defend
this basic Eucharistic
mystery, the Council of
Trent made a series of
definitions. Originally
drafted as negative
anathemas, they may be
reduced to the following
positive affirmation of
faith.
-
The Mass
is a true and proper
sacrifice which is
offered to God.
-
By the
words, “Do this in
commemoration of me”
(Luke 22:19; I
Corinthians 11:24),
Christ made the apostles
priests. Moreover, He
decreed that they and
other priests should
offer His Body and Blood.
-
The
Sacrifice of the Mass is
not merely an offering
of praise and
thanksgiving, or simply
a memorial of the
sacrifice on the Cross.
It is a propitiatory
sacrifice which is
offered for the living
and dead, for the
remission of sins and
punishment due to sin,
as satisfaction for sin
and for other
necessities.
-
The
Sacrifice of the Mass in
no way detracts from the
sacrifice which Christ
offered on the Cross
(Council of Trent,
Session XXII, September
17, 1562).
Volumes of
teaching by the Church’s
magisterium have been
written since the Council of
Trent. There has also been a
remarkable development of
doctrine in a deeper
understanding of the Mass.
For our purpose, there are
especially two questions
that need to be briefly
answered: 1) How is the
Sacrifice of the Mass
related to the sacrifice of
the Cross? 2) How is the
Mass a true sacrifice?
Relation of the Mass to
Calvary. In
order to see how the Mass is
related to Calvary, we must
immediately distinguish
between the actual
Redemption of the world and
the communication of
Christ’s redemptive graces
to a sinful human race.
On the
Cross, Christ really
redeemed the human family.
He is the one true Mediator
between God and an estranged
humanity. On the Cross, He
merited all the graces that
the world would need to be
reconciled with an offended
God.
When He died,
the separation of His blood
from His body caused the
separation of His human soul
from the body, which caused
His death. He willed to die
in the deepest sense of the
word. He chose to die. In
His own words, He laid down
His life for the salvation
of a sinful mankind.
But His
physical death on Calvary
was not to be an automatic
redemption of a sin-laden
world. It would not exclude
the need for us to
appropriate the merits He
gained on the Cross; nor
would it exclude the need
for our voluntary
cooperation with the graces
merited by the Savior’s
shedding of His blood.
The key to
seeing the relation between
Calvary and the Mass is the
fact that the same identical
Jesus Christ now glorified
is present on the altar at
Mass as He was present in
His mortal humanity on the
Cross.
Since it is
the same Jesus, we must say
He continues in the Mass
what He did on Calvary
except that now in the Mass,
He is no longer mortal or
capable of suffering in His
physical person. On Calvary
He was, by His own choice,
capable of suffering and
dying. What He did then was
to gain the blessings of our
redemption. What He does now
in the Mass is apply these
blessings to the constant
spiritual needs of a sinful,
suffering humanity.
Before we
look more closely at the
Mass as a sacrifice of
propitiation and petition,
we should make plain that it
is first and foremost, a
sacrifice of praise (adoration)
and thanksgiving. No less
than He did on Calvary, in
the Mass Jesus continues to
offer Himself to the
heavenly Father. Since the
highest form of honor to God
is sacrifice, the Mass is a
continuation of Christ’s
sacrifice of praise and
gratitude to God the Father.
But, whereas on Calvary,
this sacrificial adoration
was bloody, causing Christ’s
physical death by
crucifixion, in the Mass the
same Jesus is now
sacrificing Himself in an
unbloody manner because He
is now glorified, immortal,
and incapable of suffering
or dying in His own physical
person.
We now turn
from the Mass as a sacrifice
of adoration and thanks
(referring to God), to the
Mass as a sacrifice of
propitiation and petition
(referring to us).
Notice we use
two words, propitiation
and petition.
They are not the same.
-
The Mass
is the most powerful
means we have to obtain
propitiation for sin.
This occurs in different
ways.
 |
Through the Mass,
God’s mercy makes
reparation for the
want of divine love
that we have shown
by committing sin.
|
 |
Through the Mass,
God’s mercy removes
the guilt of
repented venial sins
and moves the sinner
estranged from Him
to return to God.
|
 |
Through the Mass,
God’s mercy remits
more or less of the
punishment still due
on earth to forgiven
sins.
|
 |
Through the Mass,
God’s mercy also
remits more or less
of the punishment
which the souls in
purgatory have to
undergo before
entering heaven.
|
-
The Mass
is a powerful means of
petition to God for the
graces that we and
others need in our
pilgrimage through life.
 |
Graces are necessary
for the mind to know
what is God’s will
and how it should be
fulfilled.
|
 |
Graces are necessary
for the will to
desire what pleases
God, to choose what
He wants us to do,
and to sustain our
choice by loving Him
above all things.
|
In both ways,
as a means of propitiation
and petition, the Mass is a
sacrament. It confers the
graces needed from God’s
mercy to expiate the sins of
the past and the graces
needed from God’s bounty to
obtain His blessings for the
future.
The Mass a True
Sacrifice. Since
the first century of her
existence, the Church has
considered the Mass a
sacrifice. The earliest
manual of the liturgy
(before 90 A.D.) has this
directive for the attendance
of Sunday Mass.
On the
Lord’s own day, assemble
in common to break bread
and offer thanks. But
first confess your sins
so that your sacrifice
may be pure. However, no
one quarreling with his
brother may join your
meeting until they are
reconciled; your
sacrifice must not be
defiled
(Teaching
of the Twelve Apostles,
14).
Why is the
Mass a true sacrifice?
Because in the Mass the same
Jesus Christ who offered
Himself on Calvary now
offers Himself on the altar.
The Priest is the same, the
Victim is the same, and the
end or purpose is the same.
The Priest is
the same Jesus Christ whose
sacred person the ordained
priest represents and in
whose Name he offers the
Eucharistic Sacrifice.
The Victim is
the same, namely the Savior
in His human nature, with
His true Body and Blood, and
His human free will. Only
the manner of offering is
different. On the Cross, the
sacrifice was bloody; in the
Mass it is unbloody because
Christ is now in His
glorified state. But the
heart of sacrifice is the
voluntary, total offering of
oneself to God. Christ makes
this voluntary offering in
every Mass, signified by the
separate consecration of the
bread and wine into the Body
and Blood of the Redeemer.
The end or
purpose is the same, namely
to give glory to God, to
thank Him, to obtain His
mercy, and to ask Him for
our needs. But, as we have
seen, whereas on Calvary
Christ merited our salvation,
it is mainly through the
Mass that He now dispenses
the riches of His saving
grace.
Eucharist as
Communion – Sacrament
The biblical
foundation for Holy
Communion is what Christ
Himself did at the Last
Supper. As narrated by St.
Matthew, Jesus first offered
the apostles what He was
about to change, then
changed the bread and wine,
and then gave them
Communion.
And while
they were at supper,
Jesus took bread and
blessed and broke and
gave it to His disciples
and said, “Take you and
eat, this is my Body.”
And taking the chalice
He gave thanks and gave
it to them saying,
“Drink you all of this.
For this is my Blood of
the New Testament which
shall be shed for many
unto remission of sins”
(Matthew 26:26-28).
St. John, who
does not give us the
narrative of the institution
of the Eucharist, devotes a
whole chapter to Christ’s
promise of giving His
followers His own flesh to
eat and His own blood to
drink. What Christ
emphasizes is the absolute
necessity of being nourished
by His Body and Blood if the
supernatural life received
at Baptism is to be
sustained.
I tell
you most solemnly, if
you do not eat the flesh
of the Son of Man and
drink His blood, you
will not have life in
you. Anyone who does eat
my flesh and drink my
blood has eternal life
and I shall raise him up
on the last day. For my
flesh is real food and
my blood is real drink.
He who eats my flesh and
drinks my blood lives in
me and I live in Him. As
I, who am sent by the
living Father, myself
draw life from the
Father, so whoever eats
me will draw life from
me. This is the bread
come down from heaven;
not like the bread our
ancestors ate. They are
dead, but anyone who
eats this bread will
live forever (John 6:
53-58).
Throughout
the gospels and St. Paul,
Christ uses words like
“take,” “eat,” “drink,”
always clearly indicating
that the Eucharist is to be
taken into the mouth and
consumed. No less, and far
more, than material food and
drink are necessary to
sustain the natural life of
the body, so Holy Communion
must be received to support
and nourish the supernatural
life of the soul.
Effects of Holy
Communion. Since
the earliest times, the
benefits of receiving the
Body and Blood of Christ
were spelled out to
encourage frequent, even
daily, Holy Communion.
Thus, St.
Cyril of Jerusalem (died
387) said that reception of
the Eucharist makes the
Christian a “Christbearer”
and “one body and one blood
with Him” (Catecheses,
4,3). St. John Chrysostom
(died 407) speaks of a
mixing of the Body of Christ
with our body, “…in order to
show the great love that He
has for us. He mixed Himself
with us, and joined His Body
with us, so that we might
become one like a bread
connected with the body” (Homily
46,3). These and other
comparisons of how Communion
unites the recipient with
Christ are based on Christ’s
own teaching, and St. Paul’s
statement that, “the bread
which we break, is it not
the partaking of the Body of
the Lord? For we, being
many, are one bread, all
that partake of this bread”
(I Corinthians 10:16-17).
So, too, the
Church officially teaches
that “Every effect which
bodily food and bodily drink
produce in our corporeal
life, by preserving this
life, increasing this life,
healing this life, and
satisfying this life – is
also produced by this
Sacrament in the spiritual
life” (Council of Florence,
November 22, 1439). Thus:
-
Holy
Communion preserves the
supernatural life of the
soul by giving the
communicant supernatural
strength to resist
temptation, and by
weakening the power of
concupiscence. It
reinforces the ability
of our free will to
withstand the assaults
of the devil. In a
formal definition, the
Church calls Holy
Communion “an antidote
by which we are
preserved from grievous
sins” (Council of Trent,
October 11, 1551).
-
Holy
Communion increases the
life of grace already
present by vitalizing
our supernatural life
and strengthening the
virtues and gifts of the
Holy Spirit we possess.
To be emphasized,
however, is that the
main effect of Communion
is not to remit sin. In
fact, a person in
conscious mortal sin
commits a sacrilege by
going to Communion.
-
Holy
Communion cures the
spiritual diseases of
the soul by cleansing it
of venial sins and the
temporal punishment due
to sin. No less than
serving as an antidote
to protect the soul from
mortal sins, Communion
is “an antidote by which
we are freed from our
daily venial sins” (Council
of Trent, October 11,
1551). The remission of
venial sins and of the
temporal sufferings due
to sin takes place
immediately by reason of
the acts of perfect love
of God, which are
awakened by the
reception of the
Eucharist. The extent of
this remission depends
on the intensity of our
charity when receiving
Communion.
-
Holy
Communion gives us a
spiritual joy in the
service of Christ, in
defending His cause, in
performing the duties of
our state of life, and
in making the sacrifices
required of us in
imitating the life of
our Savior.
On Christ’s
own promise, Holy Communion
is a pledge of heavenly
glory and of our bodily
resurrection from the dead
(John 6:55). St. Irenaeus
(died 202) simply declared
that, “when our bodies
partake of the Eucharist,
they are no longer
corruptible as they have the
hope of eternal
resurrection” (Against
the Heresies, IV, 18,5).
Reception of the
Eucharist. We
may distinguish four stages
in the Church’s history on
the frequency of receiving
Holy Communion. In the early
centuries, the Eucharist was
received often, even daily.
By the early Middle Ages,
neglect of the Sacrament
caused a general council of
the Church to pass a law
that is still in effect. The
Fourth Lateran Council in
1215 A.D. decreed that on
reaching the age of
discretion, every Catholic
should receive Holy
Communion after having gone
to the Sacrament of Penance.
In the
sixteenth century, the
Council of Trent repeated
the foregoing decree and
condemned “anyone who denies
that each and every one of
Christ’s faithful of both
sexes is bound, when he
reaches the age of reason,
to receive Communion at
least every year during the
Paschal season according to
the command of holy Mother
Church” (October 11, 1551).
With the rise
of Jansenism in the
seventeenth century,
reception of Communion
reached an all time low. One
result was that people were
known not to make their
First Communion until they
were dying. All the while,
however, zealous apostles of
the Eucharist, like Saints
Ignatius Loyola, Vincent de
Paul and Alphonsus Liguori,
were urging the faithful to
receive as often as
possible. In his
Spiritual Exercises, St.
Ignatius says, we should
“praise the reception of the
Most Holy Sacrament once a
year, and what is much
better once a month, and
much better still every
eight days, always with the
requisite and due
dispositions” (Rules for
Thinking with the Church,
3).
Finally in
1905, Pope St. Pius X issued
his famous decree on
frequent communion, and it
has made Eucharistic
history. The pope said:
Frequent
and daily Communion, as
a thing most earnestly
desired by Christ our
Lord and by the Catholic
Church, should be open
to all the faithful of
whatever rank and
condition of life; so
that no one who is in
the state of grace, and
who approaches the holy
table with a right and
devout intention, can
lawfully be hindered
from receiving….
A right
intention consists in
this: that he who
approaches the holy
table should do so, not
out of routine or
vainglory or human
respect, but for the
purpose of pleasing God,
of being more closely
united with Him by
charity, and of seeking
this divine remedy for
his weaknesses and
defects (December 20,
1905).
The new Code
of Canon Law builds on this
legislation of St. Pius X
and even permits reception
twice a day. According to
the Code, “A person who has
received the Most Holy
Eucharist may receive it
again on the same day only
within a Eucharistic
celebration in which that
person participates” (Canon
917).
Eucharist as
Presence – Sacrament
Although we
have reserved our
reflections on the Real
presence for the end, we
could just as well have
begun with the Eucharist as
Presence-Sacrament. The
reason is that logically,
the Mass and Holy Communion
derive all their meaning
from the Real Presence of
Jesus Christ in the Blessed
Sacrament.
As we
did before, so here again we
shall draw on the
irreversible teaching of the
Council of Trent about the
Real Presence. The original
doctrine is worded in the
form of anathemas. What
follows is a summary list of
these dogmas expressed in
positive terms.
-
The Body
and Blood of Christ
together with the soul
and divinity of Christ
and therefore the whole
Christ, is truly,
really, and
substantially contained
in the sacrament of the
most Holy Eucharist.
-
By that
wonderful and
extraordinary change,
called
transubstantiation, the
whole substance of the
bread is changed into
Christ’s Body, and the
whole substance of the
wine is changed into His
blood, so that only the
species’ properties of
bread and wine remain.
-
In the
venerable sacrament of
the Eucharist, the whole
Christ is contained
under each species, and
under each and every
portion of either
species when it is
divided up.
-
After the
consecration, the Body
and Blood of our Lord
Jesus Christ are present
in the marvelous
sacrament of the
Eucharist. They are
present not only in the
use of the sacrament
while it is being
received, but also
before and after.
Consequently, the true
Body and Blood of the
Lord remain in the
consecrated hosts or
particles that are kept
or left over after
Communion.
-
Christ,
the only-begotten Son of
God, is to be adored in
the holy sacrament of
the Eucharist with the
worship due to God and
including external
worship. The Blessed
Sacrament is therefore
to be honored with
extraordinary festive
celebrations, solemnly
carried from place to
place in processions,
and is to be publicly
exposed for the people’s
adoration.
-
The Holy
Eucharist is to be kept
in a sacred place
(Council of Trent,
October 11, 1551).
It is
impossible to exaggerate the
importance of the foregoing
definitions of the Catholic
Church on the Real Presence.
No doubt, their doctrinal
substance had been part of
the Church’s faith since the
time of Christ. But the
clear and simple expression
of this faith in the
sixteenth century marked a
turning point in Catholic
devotions to Jesus Christ,
now present on earth no less
than He was visibly present
in first-century Palestine.
Transubstantiation. To
identify what takes place in
the consecration at Mass,
the Church has come to
employ the term
“transubstantiation” (trans
= change, substantiation
= of substance). Because of
its importance for
understanding the Real
Presence, this term deserves
some explanation.
There are two
kinds of changes which
things can naturally
undergo. They are called
accidental and substantial
changes. In an accidental
change, something remains
substantially the same, but
its accidental or
non-essential properties are
transformed. Thus when a
block of marble is carved
into a statue, the marble
remains marble, but its
shape and form are changed.
In a
substantial change, the
former substance ceases to
exist and becomes something
else. Thus, when food is
eaten, its substance is
changed; it becomes part of
the organism which consumes
the food.
In
transubstantiation there is
a unique substantial change.
The essence or substance of
bread and wine ceases to
exist, while the accidents
or sensibly perceptible
properties of bread and wine
remain. This kind of change
has no counterpart in
nature; it belongs to the
supernatural order.
What actually
occurs? The substance of
what was bread and wine is
replaced by the living
Christ. Although the
external qualities of bread
and wine remain, their
substance is no longer on
the altar. It is now the
whole Christ, divinity and
humanity, soul and body, and
all the bodily qualities
that make Christ, Christ.
In his
historic encyclical The
Mystery of Faith, Paul
VI goes into great detail to
show that transubstantiation
produces a unique presence
of Jesus Christ on earth.
The pope analyzes six ways
in which the Savior is
present and active in the
world of human beings, but
they are not the Real
Presence. The Real Presence
is unique because “it
contains Christ Himself.”
Moreover, this presence is
called Real because
it is the presence “by which
Christ, the God-Man is
wholly and entirely present”
(Mysterium Fidei,
September 3, 1965).
Worship of the Holy
Eucharist. There
has been a remarkable
development of doctrine on
the Real Presence. Already
in the infant Church, the
faithful did not doubt that
by the words of consecration
by the priest, what had been
bread is now the living
Christ. However, as certain
theories began to emerge
that called the Real
Presence into question, two
things happened. The
Church’s magisterium began
to express her Eucharistic
faith in even sharper and
clearer terms; and the
Church’s saints began to
foster devotion to the
living Christ who is present
in our midst in the Blessed
Sacrament.
The classic
expression of faith in the
Real Presence was drafted by
Pope Gregory VII in a
Eucharistic Creed that
leaves no room for
compromise.
I believe
in my heart and openly
profess that the bread
and wine placed upon the
altar are, by the
mystery of the sacred
prayer and the words of
the Redeemer,
substantially changed
into the true and
life-giving flesh and
blood of Jesus Christ
our Lord, and that after
the consecration there
is present the true body
of Christ which was born
of the Virgin and
offered up for the
salvation of the world,
being hung on the cross
and now sits at the
right hand of the
Father, and there is
present the true blood
of Christ which flowed
from His side. They are
present not only by
means of a sign and of
the efficacy of the
sacrament, but also in
the very reality and
truth of their nature
and substance (Council
of Rome, February 11,
1079).
Long before
this famous profession of
faith, the Holy Eucharist
had been worshipped by the
faithful. But the adoration
of the Real Presence for
prolonged periods of time
did not become widespread
until about the beginning of
the thirteenth century. The
immediate occasion for this
practice was the great
devotion to the Blessed
Sacrament of the Belgian
Augustinian nun, St. Juliana
of Mont Cornillon
(1193-1258).
St. Juliana
urged the bishop of Liege to
institute a feast in honor
of the Real Presence. The
bishop ordered such a feast
for his diocese in 1246. On
September 8, 1264, the
Belgian Pope, Urban IV,
established the feast of
Corpus Christi and ordered
St. Thomas Aquinas to
compose its Divine Office.
Three of our best known
Eucharistic hymns are part
of this Divine Office,
namely Pange Lingua,
which closes with the two
verses of Tantum Ergo;
Sacris Solemniis,
which closes with the two
verses of Panis Angelicus;
and Verbum Supernum,
which closes with the two
verses of O Salutaris
Hostia.
No less than
eleven canons of the new
Code of Canon Law deal with
“the Reservation and
Veneration of the Most Holy
Eucharist.” They cover every
significant aspect of
Catholic veneration of the
Holy Eucharist.
 |
The
Sacrament is to be
reserved in every
cathedral, parish church
and church or oratory of
a religious institute or
society of apostolic
life (Canon 934).
|
 |
The
church should be open to
the faithful, “at least
some hours each day so
that they are able to
spend some time in
prayer before the Most
Blessed Sacrament”
(Canon 937).
|
 |
The
tabernacle in which the
Most Holy Eucharist is
reserved should be
situated in a
distinguished place in
the church or oratory, a
place which is
conspicuous, suitably
adorned, and conducive
to prayer” (Canon 938).
|
In one
country after another,
adoration of the Holy
Eucharist has developed
beyond anything seen in
previous generations. Groups
have been formed among the
laity for this purpose. Some
are local organizations
associated with a single
parish church or public
oratory. Others reach out
across the nation and even
to other countries. Their
common denominator is an
intense desire to profess
one’s faith in Christ’s Real
Presence in the Eucharist,
and to pray for the
desperate help that people
need in today’s convulsive
society.
Modern popes
have not only supported this
renewed devotion to the
Eucharist, but have done all
they could to set the
example for bishops to
follow. Thus Pope John Paul
II established the daily
exposition of the Blessed
Sacrament in St. Peter’s
Basilica. Every day, Monday
through Friday, the Blessed
Sacrament has been exposed
all day, from Latin Mass in
the morning until Italian
Vespers in the evening. Two
Sisters are in adoration in
the Blessed Sacrament Chapel
in St. Peter’s. Pilgrims to
Rome join in their prayers
before the Holy Eucharist.
When the
Perpetual Eucharistic
Exposition opened, Pope John
Paul II composed a prayer of
which the following are
significant quotations.
Lord,
“stay with us.”
These
words were spoken for
the first time by the
disciples at Emmaus. In
the course of the
centuries, they have
been spoken infinite
times, by the lips of so
many of your disciples
and confessors, O
Christ.
As Bishop
of Rome and first
servant of this temple,
which stands on the
place of St. Peter’s
martyrdom, I speak the
same words today.
Stay!
That we may meet you in
prayer of adoration and
thanksgiving, in prayer
of expiation and
petition, to which all
those who visit this
basilica are invited.
Stay! You
who are at one and the
same time veiled in the
Eucharistic mystery of
faith, and also revealed
under the species of
bread and wine, which
you have assumed in this
Sacrament.
The
Eucharist is at the same
time a constant
announcement of your
second coming and the
sign of the final
Advent, and also of the
expectation of the whole
Church.
Every day
and every hour we wish
to adore you, veiled
under the species of
bread and wine, to renew
hope of the “call to
glory” which you began
with your glorified body
“at the Father’s right
hand.”
May the
unworthy successor of
Peter in the Roman See –
and all those who take
part in the adoration of
your Eucharistic
Presence – attest with
every visit of theirs,
and make ring out again
the truth contained in
the apostle’s words:
“Lord, you know
everything; you know
that I love you.” Amen.
In one
diocese after another,
bishops have encouraged the
adoration of Jesus Christ in
the Blessed Sacrament by the
faithful. In a world that is
groping in darkness, the
Church is telling people
that Christ, “the light of
the world” and “the power of
salvation” is on earth to
teach us and strengthen us
on the road to heaven. All
we need is to believe that
He is here and ready
to provide us with what we
need.
|
|
|
|
|